Vsan vs nutanix reddit. Erasure Coding Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN .
Vsan vs nutanix reddit Maybe I'll talk a look at VSAN but for me the feature parity wasn't there and it was just too new. 5K subscribers in the nutanix community. I currently run several vSAN clusters in production, I would love some feedback regarding In this post, we compare VMware and Nutanix, highlighting their features, strengths, and weaknesses to help IT managers make an informed decision about the best infrastructure for their organization. It would have been more engineering effort, but I think they should have attempted to use VxFlex/ScaleIO as the storage platform and which would have made more sense. Read the rules before posting! This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass Still Nutanix sales had no clue about SMB 3. So this will be a long process. Nutanix nodes can be configured with less storage hardware The history: Nutanix and VMware. My starwinds vsan beat out nutanix in speed and price. Love our Nutanix. Or check it out in the app stores we use iSCSI or the vSAN native feature, the latter stops us from snapshoting the VM's tho so an alternative would - i went trough VMware vSAN: Plan and Deploy [V7] training course - I have a nested vSAN lab where i am going trough setup, tshoot examples, adding and removing disks hosts etc. Reply reply Mind_Matters_Most • It's the same as Enterprise with a 4 node limitation. Some software like Nutanix or vSAN are intended to be more hardware agnostic, other solutions have much stricter hardware requirements. if vsan, add $10K for a switch they'll rec'd on their HCL (broadcomm, cisco, hpe, etc). They have no node caps on clusters due to the on node witness. With Nutanix, integrate seamlessly with existing VMware solutions under a unified single pane of 5. Azure Stack HCI is a nice option. In the previous post, I declared “a We have customers, who moved from Nutanix to a VMware vSAN deployment on Nutanix nodes, because it was cheaper than renewal. Event survived a couple feature upgraded along the way. A reddit dedicated to the Nutanix's biggest competiton from a revenue/install base perspective is VSAN actually. I feel nutanix has advantages in software defined storage technology. I have a verbal offer from nutanix and in process for the other two. So make sure you use it all. I really do hope they work on their pricing. vSAN looks interesting but per Josh Odgers articles, he seems to have done the homework to point out that vSAN has it's issues re disk failure recovery and throughput when ethernet speeds are limited/shared. You'll need more Nutanix nodes to get the same useable CPU and Memory as with vSphere. They are pushing their hypervisor now. I just think the fancy vSAN/Nutanix style compute/storage model is overkill for file server storage. (Plus help desk team) Thirtyish locations linked by Viptela SD-WAN 80ish VMs Current HCI stack is a 4 node Nutanix cluster, with an identical cluster in a colo. At 20TB vSAN might totally kill you if you weren't planning to replace your hosts. The management to it must be impossible, I helped set up the VMs for the management, and we had to set up virtual clusters within clusters, because they refused to be installed on anything but empty servers. OSA). My office simply went with vSAN because VMware gave us a bigger discount to stay with vSphere instead of ditching the software stack all together. I work for a VAR and a client is evaluating Cisco HyperFlex vs Nutanix for a 100-250 seat Citrix VDI implementation. My experience is that Nutanix is more a buy it approach, turn key ready. Nutanix you pay one (licensing)price and get it all. Welcome to the IPv6 community on Reddit. This enables companies to focus on successful business outcomes and new innovations. No it's not cheap, but it has been very solid for us. Lenovo 4 920q i5-8500 64gb. I think the bulk of the complaints with AHV come from 1. Starwinds A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Taking into account 3-2-1 rule in terms how data should be stored, please take to consideration VSAN+DRS. but we found dell servers + vmware + vsan better View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. Here we Vsan has some advantages for running in the hyper visor instead of running as a storage vm. I cant speak to reliability for nutanix but my star winds vsan has never been down going on 3 years. I was running vsphere and vsan, but after my vmug subscription came to an end I decided to make the switch; mostly due to the fact that I am running older CPU's that are not supported under vsphere 6. The SuperMicro hardware-only total comes to $27,229 with three years of 24×7 support with next-business-day hardware replacement. Am looking at Nutanix Prism + Acropolis +whatever their file server is called as potential alternative to vSphere + vSAN Hi! Kurt from Nutanix here! Work with your Nutanix SE and provide the BoM from the VxRails. We saw approximately 30-40% more usable capacity delivered by Nutanix. One of the options was VMware vSAN, which works pretty good from my experience. I did setup Proxmox+Ceph on the NucNucNuc and really enjoyed it. I equate them to Windows vs MacOS or Android vs iOS. r/nutanix A chip A close button. Nutanix has a number of different products that fit into various different places of a virtualization environment. IDC has resumed putting out hyperconverged system supplier revenue and market share numbers after after a three-quarter gap and not much has changed since the end of 2020 and the latest third Ive setup quite a few remote 3 & 4 node nutanix deployments, and a lot of 2 node vsan deployments on cisco e series blades, both worked just about as well as eachother. Even if you drop the witness and a host, you can technically still be up, but in the most likely scenario, you will lose the witness connection and somehow at the same time lose a drive which can be rebuilt I wonder, anyone dealing with HX, do you contemplate migrating to Nutanix on cisco, if it is even qualified M6 hardware that is? Or is the reasoning to turn them into normal compute and use vsan if it is unqualified hardware for Nutanix on Cisco? We are considering moving to Nutanix from VMWare. I’d recommend vsan. The reason why VDI is because the product works well for it (Data reduction doesn't do anything for linked clones), and VDI tends to be green field deployments (or breaking existing storage), while traditional workloads are on a 4-7 year Two major players in the HCI arena, Nutanix AHV and VMware vSAN, have been gaining prominence. Take advantage of what Nutanix offers versus VMware, including the efficiency, simplicity, and flexibility of unified hybrid multicloud management. ESXI and hyper V seem to dominate the market. Any feelings about using 2 vs If you are looking for a cheap storage expansion for file server and archive purposes you may want to look at Nutanix Objects in conjunction with Nutanix Files. It shouldn't be hard to use CLI only - there are shell scripts for everything but be careful that you understand what you are doing from the outset - things will go south rather quickly if you just read the documentation as you go along. an all-flash external netapp before - ymmv of course. Most of our server infrastructure lives in nutanix and their version of vsan is so much better. Nutanix offers a more predictable node-based licensing model. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment [deleted] • Seriously, we get it you work for Nutanix, are you compensated for flooding reddit with your 4. It's very easy to scale. Where the poster is wrong is with Nutanix support, we've had excellent experiences with them. Gonna redo my vSan lab to Nutanix AHV so i thought i post a picture before i kill it . we've seen performance increases with the all-flash vsan vs. In this part, we VMWare/vSAN we eliminated due to vSan performance, VMware licensing, cost, and because it didn't really help with my core desire in HCI, spending less time managing infrastructure. Nutanix will fully utilize the bigger pipe you can provide to it Tackle file services first. Even more important, on a Tintri all-flash SAN, or on Nutanix/VSAN, you get performance visibility, QOS, snapshots, cloning and replication all at the VM level. (Ok Nutanix has 3 licensing tiers but you still get most things in one package). Different codebase but the underlying storage is object based. Next, we compared Deduplication & Compression technologies where we learned Nutanix has outright capacity efficiency, flexibility, resiliency Just overall poor performance, especially compared to vsan. Hi, hoping this reddit can help. We had a great experience with Starwinds Appliances. Log In / Sign Up; Sorry i am very new at this (reddit and IT industry) and i am not on technical side but more of the administration side. Acropolis is a great tool, and potentially can Like most of us vmware admins, I am currently evaluating a post VMware Future at my company. It is nice, but it is still have issues, so we prefer to deploy VMware vSAN for most of our cutsomers. I haven't gone back and revisited it yet. It looks very promising but extremely basic in terms of the UI, far from being mainstream yet. Nutanix broke up with Dell and got in bed with HP. VSAN vs. The trade off is that every SSD in the system needs to be higher endurance Mixed Use (around 5 DWPD endurance), because each SSD sees a much higher write load vs. It's great! It works as advertised, great performance, easy to manage. We are now talking about ditching VMware and just running with pure Nutanix. Another option, if you can afford it would be VMWare ready nodes and use VMware vSAN. Migrated our 65 or so VMs from a Nutanix cluster and haven’t looked back. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's In the first post in this series, I compared the actual Usable Capacity between Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN on the same hardware. 5 nics The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips, TechQuickie and other LinusMediaGroup content. Reddit is also anonymous so you can About 1/2 the deployments I see are VDI. Starwinds Appliances are cheaper and more flexible from my experience. based on you guys replies i think i will go the traditional SAN route then, the only gripe i have is that the Nimble SAN i am looking at is the HF20, and i can get two AF Hitachi SAN's Whatever little market Nutanix has, they are loosing it to VMware's VSan. No question. Support has been generally good. Nutanix The un-official Dell EMC VxRail SubReddit. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. If I had my way, and $$$, I would have Nutanix at all sites, setup DR replication (latency permitting) etc. For our Choosing between Nutanix AHV and VMware vSAN depends on various factors, including existing infrastructure, management preferences, and specific workload In my opinion, the biggest difference between Nutanix and VMware vSAN is flexibility and choice. The Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure solution combines the Nutanix Acropolis virtualization solution, Nutanix AHV hypervisor (though Acropolis works with other hypervisors), Prism cluster manager, Nutanix Calm and Nutanix Flow server management, vsan needs a dedicated storage switch, starwind does not. Azure/Vsan/vxrail does have a cluster cap. We started migrating around 2016 after the vSAN fiasco and AHV being free at the time was a big sell. Nutanix Customer List Price Comparison. No hardware replacement is required for 2-node HCL HA setup over C6320 you have. 5 and certified VCP for 5 and 6. If your team doesn’t mind learning how to manage nutanix it’s fine, but vsan is much easier since its all managed through vcenter. Any advice on your experiences or thoughts on these technologies? Any obvious pro's/con's of It's not necessarily a raid across disks in the server. Later version of vmware 7 now includes the cluster vsan shutdown wizard. Nutanix Objects is relatively cheap compared to both Nutanix AOS and other solutions listed in this thread. but our experience then was a lot of tweaking when the software was "supposed" to work. Thanks A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. We are moving FROM nutanix to vSAN, mostly due to renewal and license costs. Reply Mostly, it was just really expensive for what it is compared to either Nutanix or vSAN ready nodes. 1 (not 6. HP StoreVirtual is compatible with Hyper-V, VMWare, Xen and I believe even KVM now. VSAN itself carries a list price of $2495 per processor, so that’s If you want to test SDS solutions, something like Nutanix, Ceph, VMware vSAN, or S2D is better starting from 4 nodes. Also, future licensing concerns with VMWare/Broadcom. It gave me some errors and went through several troubleshooting steps. spdrweb8 vSAN — VMware’s software-defined storage solution that integrates directly with vSphere. As an example, this Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm writes, "We looked briefly at alternatives, but nothing stood out like vSAN. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Nutanix vs Simplivity . So then i ran across xenServer but any demo/tutorial videos i can find of it are from yearS ago. We love it running ESXi! We've got extensive experience with SimpliVity and VSAN. There's too much going on. It's also not cheap depending on the features you want. There is a host of training materials provided by both vendors. They are more flexible and cheaper. Get a constantly updating feed of breaking news, fun stories, pics, memes, and videos just for you. For the same cost as an HCI solution, you could get a far more resilient and better performing traditional SAN. I posted in a separate section of this thread with some comparisons from my PoV Write I/O Path (FTT1/RF2) Comparison – Nutanix vs VMware vSAN; In this series, we’ve learned Nutanix provides more usable Capacity along with greater capacity efficiency, flexibility, resiliency and performance when We use Citrix & Nutanix. As much as I love VSAN and Nutanix, the reality is that HCI solutions aren't that cost effective for smaller environments due to the license cost. 6 powered cluster. Also gotta take in to account the larger overhead of Nutanix vs vSphere and the lower density ratios of Nutanix vs vSphere. Size accordingly. a vSAN Topology. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. I'm trying to get a good feel on both the pro's and cons of both systems and wanted to know if any other sysadmins have gone through a similar Press Nutanix on the price and they will come down pretty good. We like to call this the Tinkerer Model vs Consumer Model. For a SMB estate on a moderate budget I would go hyperconverged, probably Nutanix. Win, RHEL, SQL, SAP, HANA, Oracle, appliances - just everything. Question I’ve been reading up on these two HCI options. JetzeMellema All I can think of when I hear the name Nutanix is the battles you fought on Twitter and on discussion forums, the negativity, how little Nutanix in San Jose, California offers their software-defined Enterprise Cloud as a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. The official Python community for Reddit! Stay up to date with the latest news, packages, and meta information relating to the I'm also among those who do not recommend sticking with Dell VxRail. 7. Nutanix fit that bill perfectly and they played ball on pricing. We have customer moving from Nutanix to a VMware vSAN deployments. a FTT1 for vSAN and RF2 for Nutanix). Top. We use Veeam B&R to backup VMs and we are happy with it. This also has implications on SSD Capacity, as Nutanix must generally stick with eMLC or Very High Endurance TLC to keep write endurance at levels that are acceptable. The way they handled storage particularly replication and fault tolerance before VSAN caught up was pretty nice. Architecturally, Nutanix is superior to either of these platforms. As an official Fidelity customer care channel, our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity – directly from Fidelity Associates. 0. Trusted by companies worldwide, Nutanix powers hybrid multicloud environments efficiently and cost effectively. In part 2, we’ll look deeper at how, when and where the data reduction takes place. If you're thinking about moving from vmware hypervisor, give Nutanix a try. I'm pretty sure Nutanix AHV / KVM is a capable hypervisor A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. VXRail is pre-engineered vSAN with better management. vSAN ESA vs Nutanix AOS Ok, une question simple, mais peut-être pas une réponse simple. A companion sub to /r/sysadmin where redditors can share their blog articles, news links and Post-Broadcom buy out, VMWares pricing model has become distasteful to me after being a vmware drummer for over a decade. Create a VM with anything qemu based using the same vdisk HBAs (SATA vs SCSI, etc) and it should boot. Usable capacity for Nutanix and vSAN is similar in that both keep two or three copies of data (resulting in usable of 50% or 33%0 BUT the big difference is Nutanix stores and distributes data in 1MB chunks which means storage is very efficiently used, whereas more free space can (and usually is) required with vSAN since it stores larger objects (up to 255GB) which can fragment Due to the high standard we hold for the quality of any release, we have decided to delay the GA of vSphere 8 and vSAN 8 until October 11. View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. Next we compared Deduplication & Compression technologies where we learned Nutanix has outright capacity efficiency, flexibility, resiliency Nutanix has a range of hardware you can use, their own version of KVM with added features (you can scrap VMware licensing) or even go with Hyper-V, SimpliVity benefits from ASIC offloading gets better dedupe/compression ratios cannot do KVM or Hyper-V must be dual CPU and All Flash, vxRail is just DELL/EMC packaged VSAN with a little special sauce since they are so Nutanix vs. 14 votes, 13 comments. HyperV is my last resort option. A sub reddit for Irish and Ireland-based Devs Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. In a recent post, I compared the actual Usable Capacity between Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN on the same hardware and we saw approx 30-40% more usable capacity delivered by Nutanix. 2-3 node storage clusters are better with something like Starwinds vSAN. iii) Drawbacks to vSAN is how quickily you can rebuild datachunks. comment sorted by Best Top New We're still looking as we heavily use vSAN and NSX. Support consolidation is certainly nice to have, but I'd like to add a few other points: Tier 1 storage performance: vSAN is capable of extremely high throughput and sub-millisecond latency Simplicity of scale up/scale out: just add disks to servers, or more servers. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Anyone ever compare the 2? I am looking at 3 Nutanix nodes for my primary DC and a standalone ESXi host at DR DC and replicating with Veeam vs 2 Simplivity Omnicubes at primary and a single Omnicube at DR and using their builtin replication. VMware: 5 Key Differences and How to Choose. 20K subscribers in the SysAdminBlogs community. Most do light office work, some need light audio-visual support (watch YouTube and clipart animations). Are you strict on Nutanix or are you open to other [hyper] converged platforms? Our current POC list: Dell XC line with Nutanix Built in. Nutanix allows you the flexibility We had significantly more experience with Nutanix vs vSAN (like years). They market themselves on simplicity for setting up and managing the hypervisor, discovering and adding hosts, metrics, etc. So if you want vSwitch with vSphere you need the right license. 2), with a bunch of products stitched together to make it work. I've finally threw in the towel and said screw it. VMware and Nutanix both offer very similar things. Nutanix pioneered the HCI market, modernizing IT design and VSAN has a strict Hardware compatibility list and there's a good chance that your existing servers won't qualify, VSAN requires 3 hosts MINIMUM. We currently have 10 hosts running vSAN. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying Skip to main content. Been a VMware guy since 3. VMware: See the Difference. temporarily . e all VM's get same performance, regardless of location/node etc). We’ve also learned Nutanix provides far easier and superior storage scalability and has greatly reduce impact from Drive failures. Nutanix pioneered the HCI market, modernizing IT design and operations via a web-scale, distributed cloud architecture using off-the-shelf servers to run business-critical workloads, cloud-native, and AI applications. Come and join us today! Sorry for the delay. 2K subscribers in the nutanix community. Open comment sort options. I keep reading about these companies looking at their infrastructure's graphs but outside of Nutanix the fact that Nutanix give users more flexibility, i am struggling to understand how their infrastructures are different. You might also find real user reviews for VMware vSAN and Nutanix on IT Central Station to be helpful. This poster is correct that Nutanix is the best. r/vmware. I haven’t used them but I suspect their cloud and data protection items are a bit easier to work with. The networking does not need to be segmented like vSAN does, and IIRC separating out that network can mess with the CVM networking. Pros - vSAN is compatible with more expensive hardware and nutanix only homolog hardwares. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. While VSAN ready nodes are a little more of a build it yourself HCI solution. Nutanix- HPE has expanded their partnership with Nutanix to try to avoid dependence on VMware. I will be publishing a separate detailed comparison between deploying software In general, you'll find quite a bit of content with a search on reddit, as there's been quite a few threads about Nutanix. The only HCI I've personally had positive experiences with, mostly because I wasn't footing the bill, was I've read a bunch of reddit posts, and reviews of both nimble and nutanix and they both get rave reviews. IMHO, vSAN doesn't do a great job in rebuilding VMs as quickly enough as some of the other HCI's out here (Nutanix and Scale Computing). I love the simplicity of Nutanix but VSAN 6 looks great also. Lequel choisiriez-vous et pourquoi? Fondamentalement, une question Nutanix vs Vxrail? It then looks like Nutanix were the ones who wanted to include an underpowered VSAN system in the mix which sounds somewhat shady to me. I'm not saying VSAN has the features that Nutanix does though. Dell EMC VxRail Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Appliances (G Series, E Series, V Series, P Series, S Series), software running on them (VxRail Manager, VMware Virtual SAN Enterprise, VMware vCenter Server, VMware vRealize Log Insight, VMware vSphere Data Protection, VMware vSphere Replication, Dell EMC Early vSAN was a fucking nightmare that I never wanted to re-live, and left a bad taste in my mouth. From the article: During our good faith back and forth on testing, Nutanix suggested shipping us their own lower-spec VSAN platform and a Nutanix NX-3460-G4 (4x HDD and 2x SSD per node). The latest version of Nutanix doesn't like the gen7 NUCs at all. Usb/sd boot with 256 nvme cache tier , 1tb sata sdd capacity tier. VSAN would mirror the VM on other nodes based on your storage policy if you setup tolerances for a node failure. The other 1/2 are general server BCA (SQL/Exchange/Line of Buisness apps). k. Cisco Hyperflex is truly a turnkey solution. We had environments that were nutanix and some that were vsan and once it came time to refresh them it was clear it was cheaper to just replace the nutanix with vsan than to keep them alive. 0) is new, and is based off of VSAN 6. Passionate about something niche? Reddit has thousands of vibrant communities with people that share your interests. As mentioned, Nutanix is KVM under the hood, so you can easily migrate to any KVM-based solution. Both do pretty much the same thing. Our customers also use Starwinds HCA for smaller deployments. I would agree about vendor lock. Then the customer compares vSAN and Nutanix which both use replication as a primary form of data protection (as opposed to traditional RAID) with either two copies (RF2 in Nutanix, FTT1 in vSAN) or three copies (RF3 or If you're looking at trying to consolidate and reduce costs, HCI makes a ton of sense. I'm moving us to ProxMox which is what I am doing now. reReddit: Top posts of November 24, 2016. Going as well as can be expected for a GA release. Between the two options, I would choose Nutanix. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; Shop Collectible Avatars; When you compare vSAN vs Nutanix pools & containers it's not really a direct comparison. Currently we run VMware on the Nutanix cluster. Erasure Coding Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. The only immediate use case I can up for vSAN was potentially VDI because the licensing costs A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. I have no complaints with Nutanix, I have a great sales/support team and problems are always resolved quickly. I can't say about the pricing, we haven't had a lot of deployments. I haven't tried Gluster, but I I have been very happy about our nimble SAN, but i owe the buisness to look at all possible solutions, and i was thought vSAN had matured over the past years, but doesnt sound like it i guess. Both platforms will keep copy data for integrity spread across all nodes in the cluster, and in the event of a disk failure or node, ensure that due to that failure, you have a working system still. Posted by u/pac-man230 - No votes and 39 comments The history: Nutanix and VMware. Free is CLI only. Our goal is to help Redditors get answers to questions about Fidelity products and services, money If you really wanna go vSAN, go with VMware. I know this because I've had to do a recovery of a VSAN cluster from a ransomware attack (I managed 95% recovery of their data and VM's which was really good and actually made easier by the object-based storage underlying VSAN). Members Online. With that experience we had streamlined the configuration, management, maintenance, elasticity, etc of our platform. To prepare, I'm considering migrating my homelab. Other considerations would be cost (HP StoreVirtual due to choice of compute layer) and support (couldn't say personally though I know HP networking product support is fantastic). They release poorly designed and improperly implemented products, they lie and twist and they harass their VSAN will lock you in to VMWare. So, imagine if you had a use case for multiple ZFS hosts and making them work cohesively. Nutanix's warranty/Equipment is almost EOL and the VSAN isn't setup right and doesn't do mixed mode or dedicated storage. The load currently is mostly Citrix (about 140 servers using published desktop and published apps) with about 25 backend servers consisting of SQL and a couple web servers. I hope it gets there though, would be nice to have another open source option alternative to something like VMware ESXi + VSAN or Nutanix. VMware’s vSphere, vCenter, vSAN, and NSX all follow these varied licensing structures. Nutanix vs white boxes on VSAN 6 . vSphere will need to be licensed identically for both configurations, so that’s a wash and not included here. When considering the effect a single disk failing has on a vSAN cluster vs a Nutanix cluster I would not trust critical workloads on vSAN. They are hypervisor agnostic but they do offer their own. Had to pay more than double in "Nutanix software licenses" than if I just bought the memory for a regular R730 server - even though the memory has the exact same part number When I powered them back on the vsan wouldn't respond. ReddIt. Nutanix involves running a "software controller" on the server as a virtual machine, and using spare resources on that same server to host other workloads. You can also use Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. If you want vSan then you buy another license. Our business is in the process of moving towards a hyperconverged Infrastructure and we are evaluating both Nutanix and VMWare HCI using their VSAN technology. That being said new company also has Nutanix. you can do direct connect fiber on the nodes and youre' done. Dell EMC just tries to force a limited version of vSAN down your throat. 5 Is shipping currently so with either VSAN solution the end result is going to be a VSAN 6. AKA Move the File Shares on Windows, Nutanix, and VSAN to NetApp AFF C400 system. VxRail 4. What do you guys think? This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments Storage Spaces Direct is included with that offers hyper-convergence without the additional cost of vSan or Nutanix. The primary considerations in the comparison VMware vSAN vs Nutanix are the specifics and requirements of your industry and organization. I've worked on vSAN and Nutanix for over a decade, and while similar under the covers, I think nutanix is a better option overall. I have two nutanix clusters running AHV, one runs citrix VDI desktops and the other for servers. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's I'm a past Nutanix customer and had nothing but good experiences with those appliances, but for whatever reason our higher ups dislike the name and brand because our past appliances were "slow" and "clunky" and didn't seem interested in hearing about how we were past due for refreshes as we were one of the early adopters of nutanix back in 2013 and were still running VMware is a rock solid platform, and ive used vsan in my homelab for years without issues, however it is very large and complex. I actually built a three node NUC cluster, with the intention of testing out Nutanix, which I called the NucNucNuc (for the stooges) Unfortunately, it didn't go well. Maybe a NetApp/NAS, if that's more your style. If I recall correctly, you create a disk group with at least one SSD per node. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at Nutanix isn't just a hypervisor. Licensing of vSAN has a trend to be more economical compared to Nutanix. I was scanned and now get tons of their marketing BS. Said that feature integration with Nutanix has always been quicker on the development curve. each has 2 usb 2. My desire for HCI was really about infrastructure footprint, management, upgrades/firmware. New Also, VMWare vSAN can be changed with Starwinds vSAN in Windows Server for smaller environments which is simply cheaper, and makes more sense for smaller companies. Yes, there is an initial configuration and setup needed, but it is far less in-depth than of the initial deployment for VMware vSAN. We are selling them hardware (which is on HCL, of course) and help with cluster configuration. Also, a robust alternative is the StarWind HCA solution. There is a reason why the other vendors do not allow performance Dell Powerflex vs Nutanix . In this part of the blog series, we cover each product’s I/O Path for write operations with mirroring (a. If you were to choose a turnkey solution, like HyperFlex, it is much easier to just set it up and have it run. Hi guys, I'm trying to work out the best option for a greenfield site which will have around 100 VMs across 2 sites. Reddit . Nutanix vs HCI: Lefthand (if you can still get it) Simplivity -decent features, but if you don't fit its specific use cases it can be difficult to justify the costs and limitations vs VSAN. 2. It is a great option, IMO. Both cohesity and Nutanix are in deep waters and it is reflecting in their current stae of affairs (senior executives are taking paycut). 19K subscribers in the SysAdminBlogs community. which could no longer allow them to sell their crap . VxRail (VSPEX BLUE 2. I love VMware since I've become experienced with it. unsupported appliance platforms, 2. Final thoughts: VMware vs Nutanix — choosing the best HCI solution. I saw 3 disks fail on a VXRail that dropped a 4 node cluster and support couldn't do a thing. vCenter is another license. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; Shop Collectible Avatars; Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 1. EDIT: and GlusterFS might be more similar to VSAN than CEPH, but all 3 are slightly different. That's what vSAN is capable of doing or replacing. Nutanix was another solution, but surprisingly, it In part 1 of Deduplication & Compression Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN, we talked about data reduction/efficiency technologies which apply further storage capacity efficiencies to the usable capacity. I looked at Nutanix but it's wasteful for what we do so that's out. When we looked Nutanix was the strongest by far in that space for enteprise. I would also look into Nutanix Files & FSLogix for a basically all in one VDI environment. nutanix vs nvidia vs C3AI Internship Question I am looking for higher chance of return offer. I’m running both vsan on VMware readynodes and a few small nutanix clusters running VMware. Trusted by I do know though that VSAN operates very similar to Ceph. vSAN requires the VMware Hypervisor. Edit: removed the Nutanix comment as I don’t think it’l be relevant to the overall convo Share Sort by: Best. Been running solid for almost two years without issue. Dell VRTX and leveraging VMWare VSAN Dell Storages Spaces Direct ready nodes (S2D) HPe Simplivity Traditional architecture:. We have an internal process for validating the hardware config and will confirm if you need to make any modifications to the hardware (typically minimal if no changes for VxRail and VSAN ready nodes) Full Disclosure: I'm a vSAN engineer. and the guys who manage it, take FOREVER to get stuff together for us, I have more hands on experience We also use Nutanix in prod too the deployment it's super easy and their support, lifecycle management, analytics and stability is way better than VMware's vSAN. Reply Reddit . At face value they do about the same thing except Nutanix offers the ability to use different hardware, and Dell offers different pricing models (pay as you go as well as purchasing). If a node fails, vmware ha kicks in and restarts the vm's, just like vsan would so no difference there. There is a supported 2x host configuration but it requires an extra cheap-o server to act as a SAN witness and it isn't recommended. 2 introduced erasure coding, so you can have a RAID-5/6 like experience. Nutanix is available on multiple hardware platforms like Supermicro, Dell and The one advantage of Nutanix is it own hypervisor. Good thoughts. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest I had the same experience with a recent install. The following table shows the storage tiers the data reduction Since Nutanix charges more for RAM used and SSDs used? " Wanted to buy memory for some Dell XC servers with Nutanix Pro licenses. The VSAN comes with extra tools that are easier to use and save me time, but of course they came at great cost. A companion sub to /r/sysadmin where redditors can share their blog articles, news links and Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying Skip to main content. Nutanix and VMware are two of the most recognized names in hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) and virtualization. Alternatively, find out what’s trending across all of Reddit on r/popular. They are usually cheaper and their support helps with configuration More ideally you have two or more distinct hosts to handle running vSAN, and to accept/expect that vSAN is intended for host redundancy and horizontal scaling, not just cache, disk group, and controllers. VMware vs nutanix pricing comments. It's based on their VSAN technology, utilizes Dell servers, and provides decent support at both hardware and software levels. If you use the GUI you get a trail license which does not revert to free after 30 days. Best. View community ranking In the Top 10% of largest communities on Reddit. The officially unofficial VMware community on Reddit. Nutanix is awesome for large environments. VSAN is RAID 0 on host, RAID 5 over the network. I tried migrating to oVirt and Proxmox. The difference if that VxRail includes an automation engine developed with Vmware wrapped around the node. Storage, compute, networking, and virtualization, together in one platform defined by cloud-scale Trying to decide between Nutanix, Hyper-V/S2D and VMware vSphere/vSAN . joshodgers. In this article, we will delve into the key features and considerations when comparing Nutanix AHV My biggest gripe with companies like Stormagic, SC, Maxta, etc, is that they have very little community coverage due to their glossy smoke and mirrors websites . If I were building a data center today, I'd build it on Nutanix. Email. I administer a CEPH Proxmox cluster as well as a 5-node all-flash VSAN, and I find them both to have quirks. MS Exchange Performance - Nutanix vs VSAN 6. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. This keeps you within the ecosystem without running up the costs in a crazy way. Members Online • Nutanix is in the process of getting sued for breach of the open source licenses, as of yesterday . In all both solutions are great I just like the idea of having Nutanix if I wanted to switch the environment from vCenter/ESXi to AHV, Hyper-V or Xen I have that option and they've validated the workloads. We've only had issues with the regular field-replicable parts and their support has been absolutely top notch. Both clusters are Gen5, so end of support by early next year (with an extension from Nutanix). vSAN doesn't perform particularly well (thats being polite) and its not particularly trouble free based on all my experience with it. In the world of data storage, for backup and archival my money is on S3 and Glacier. Nutanix is "Hyper-Converged" in it's approach to building the datacenter fabric - meaning the compute and the storage tier are no longer separate sets of servers, but are one and the same. This is part of a series of articles about Nutanix. VXRail/VSAN just didn't seem ready yet at the time. More posts you may like. 0 being unsupported in the loopback for Hyper-V and were proudly pitching it was Nutanix who they think had invented hyper converged thing. Nutanix is quite expensive licensing wise (so is citrix) but its rock solid. The new vSAN Max offering is expected to be available in 2HFY24, and will be licensed separately from existing vSAN editions. VSAN 6. I am running CE in my homelab. vSAN- this is the standard for VMware shops. Easy as pie to set up and maintain. Then there also dHCI solutions, that are a little closer to a traditional SAN/server setup, but with a central management layer using the same network equipment for We're currently about to perform a similar migration. They have a Type-1 Hypervisor, AVH, seems to be based off of KVM/QEMU. Nutanix has some advantages in their products as they developed them more recently. you have to have an appliance for this, and download this ova and deploy it to get this additional functionality, vs with nutanix, its all in prism central. 7K subscribers in the nutanix community. Both VMware vSAN and Nutanix are SDS . As technology and markets continue to evolve, customers will View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. The customer is a UCS shop (connected to IBM storage) today w about 700 VMs (these are out of scope of this project). Expand user menu Open settings menu. A more in touch person may correct Nutanix is basically expensive replication software, sitting on top of your hardware choice (we went with Supermicro, from Nutanix). I also used Nutanix extensively for work so it was a solution I was familiar with. Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. Each node in a Nutanix cluster is licensed regardless of the number of processors or cores. Performance - I will put HX up against Nutanix/vSAN etc any day of the week. Top tier support from Nutanix too. It’s essentially VMware’s vSan vs Nutanix: Direct Comparison. I currently have 6 nodes, 4 of which make up my primary compute cluster. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break Reddit gives you the best of the internet in one place. . (In contrast, VMware has two different and separate vSAN architectures – ESA vs. Nutanix vs. I'm using Nutanix in a 3500 Horizon desktop environment and cannot be happier I made that decision to go that route. We also use veeam. In this series, we’ve learned Nutanix provides more usable Capacity along with greater capacity efficiency, flexibility, resiliency and performance when using Deduplication & Compression as well as Erasure Coding. Nutanix software is supposed to give you a view of the storage, the network, the virtualization hosts, the VMs, and security. We're a non-profit SMB with ~250 users spread across 10 sites (3 are ~50 users each) that primarily use Microsoft RDS for connectivity. I’d almost rather see you sell UCS C series with VSAN than bother with Hyperflex, even though I prefer the Nutanix and VSAN are very similar storage technologies, but obviously different enough to separate themselves from competition. We have higher IOPS, more consistent performance (i. Usable Capacity Comparison – Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN. The next logical step is to compare data reduction/efficiency technologies that apply further storage capacity efficiencies to the usable capacity. Because you'll need quite a few slots to fit all that storage. Check out ESG report for comparison. They've got a VSAN-like setup with their Unified Storage, and you can manage it all via Acropolis. The size varies from small branch offices with 1-3 hosts and vSAN to larger 10-20 node clusters, stretched with mirrored FC block storage (1 PB overall currently). With linked clones dedupe isn't quite as important and all of the solutions (VSAN vs XtremIO) are on even footing. VMware is a reputable and reliable So far HP VSA is more alike VMware VSAN and requires 3-node to setup, I would suggest you to go with StarWind VSAN. r/AZURE • Nutanix offers a single platform to run all your apps and data across multiple clouds while simplifying operations and reducing complexity. You nailed it right in the head! It's their business model being totally disconnected from the reality. Else, Vsan is a good and robust solution. a LOT of updates from Nutanix, and 3. So i'm looking for alts. In the first post in this series I compared the actual Usable Capacity between Nutanix ADSF vs VMware vSAN on the same hardware. vSAN aside, VMware itself has not given me a lot of trouble, there's a reason they are the leaders in this space. That's probably your most cost effective, fully supported option. gvhtoykwtutsrlvodbhzgrafjdvdyflvspwzdpkeznclcgejwgy