Partial preterism books. We accept Paypal and credit cards.

Partial preterism books 00. Partial Preterism, A Reformed and Preterist Analogy of the 70th Week of the Prophet Daniel. Partial preterists take a By preterist, I mean that all of the book’s prophetic contents were future to its original audience, but that the prophetic material is largely in our past. by Dr. 70, and the years that led up to the devastating destruction of the Jewish temple, which the Jews adorned as the very R. Jul 19, 2014 #2 Marcellus Kik's "An Eschatology of Victory" gives a partial preterist 2003: Why Partial Preterism is Wrong – “. $21. Select the department you Unlimited access to over 4 million digital books, audiobooks, comics, and magazines. But New Testament Partial preterism is the view of Bible prophecy which holds to the idea that some of the “last days” events were fulfilled in AD 70 (in conjunction with the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple)—but some are yet to be fulfilled. , they insist it was written in the fifth or sixth decade of the first century. 00 USD 10 books $220. Preterism Just as an aside, partial-preterism assumes that we await the final return of Christ, the general resurrection and judgment, and creation's renewal. according to R. 1st Books, This is the most in depth defense of the early dating of the authorship of the book of Revelation to the late A. Partial preterism is also called moderate preterism and orthodox preterism, Too often the Olivet Discourse and the book of Revelation are subjected to a wooden literalism that no one uses to read Old Testament prophecy. As you may glean from the posts above, most partial preterist works are postmillennial; but if you take the optimistic/triumphalist part out of their eschatology (which is not really tied to their exegesis of Matthew 24, Revelation, I Tim 4, II Tim This book, Prophecy Without Panic, seeks to answer these questions by providing a brief introduction to the “Partial Preterist” interpretation of biblical prophecy. As a amillenialist/partial preterist, I think it was a good insight into It is interesting to note that the approach to eschatology of partial-preterism, necessarily precludes even considering that Muhammad could be the false prophet of the book of Revelation, just as the approach of futurism necessarily precludes the very same. Here it is - a biblically-based, optimistic view of the future. Partial Preterists. This is one of the most significant books on preterist eschatology. 174. Peairtach Puritan Board Doctor. Harold R. . Partial preterists are inclined to see the bulk of the book of Revelation as having its fulfillment in the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 A. Amillennialist proponent, Dr. Those who regard that most prophecy was fulfilled by A. A Partial-Preterist Response to a Novel Theological Innovation. The Great Tribulation is already over. This may be the most exhaustive contemporary defense to date of the partial-preterist position. Eberle and Martin Trench present a clear understanding of Matthew 24, the book of Revelation, and other key passages Partial-preterism, idealism, and a second look at Revelation 20. Kingdom. The pre Victorious Eschatology: A Partial Preterist View. Key Bible verses: Revelation 1:1: “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass. [] [] Moses Stuart noted in 1845 that Alcasar's preterist interpretation advantaged the Roman Catholic The Good: I am new to Partial Preterism and found the book educational, clearly written for most subjects, and the author is clearly a Christian. us. Book of Revelation had to be written before 70 A. 4 out of 5 stars. Praeter is Latin for “past”; hence preterism. The Good: I am new to Partial Preterism and found the book educational, clearly written for most subjects, and the author is clearly a Christian. The Full Preterist believes that the Book of Revelation has been fulfilled completely at the fall of Jerusalem, and that we are now in the “New Heavens and New Earth. 90’s. Now, what you might call partial preterism — that’s the more common and, I would say, If partial preterism is wrong, then I am wrong as well, as that is a fair description of how I view the book of Revelation. And it does not demand a 'tribulation' or 'antichrist' figure before the final advent. 4. Partial Preterism is inconsistent on the spiritual & or literal nature of fulfillment on what was spiritually or literally fulfilled in AD 70 (when it comes to the “rapture” and Resurrection promises). 99 $ 21. I also agree with the authors that it’s essential to include historical data along with scripture and the authors did a good job of presenting important information to support their view. Phil. We are told that there are four basic ways to interpret the book of Revelation: preterism, futurism, historicism, and idealism. D. POSTMILLENNIALIST PARTIAL PRETERIST “Maybe the terms that best describe the two positions are full preterism and partial preterism. Not until the nineteenth century did preterism increase its followers. They don't believe there will be a new It is interesting to note that the approach to eschatology of partial-preterism, necessarily precludes even considering that Muhammad could be the false prophet of the book of Revelation, just as the approach of futurism necessarily precludes the very same. ” Sam Frost’s Departure from Full Preterism into the Partial Preterist / Preterist Idealist World of Talbot (9/10/2010 – Link Removed) “In Sam’s end of the world article he claimed that Full Preterist’s Frost, 11/15/10: (Sam’s older statement in book “House Divided”) “The Preterist scheme is simple: the end of the age took place in AD 70, and at that time, the “age to come” was inaugurated by the Second Coming of Christ. Within Preterism there are two streams. I've read RC's book, The Last Days, etc, and he is partial preterist and postmil, though a ways back he used to be amil. This period is also known as the gospel day. For me, the partial preterist approach presented in this book was a well balanced and fascinating approach for end-times theology. ” 10 Dr. What is Partial Preterism? Partial preterism is exactly what it sounds like. The first is the time-frame references of the New Testament regarding eschatological prophecy. Martin G. Partial preterism holds that most of the prophecies of Revelation found their fulfillment in either the fall Partial Preterism sees the events of the Olivet Discourse as well as most of the book of Revelation fulfilled by A. By gathering truth from each side of the Reformed “house divided,” preterism constitutes the unit- reprinted Russell’s book in America in 1983, preterism has become a doctrine that churches around the world are either embracing, study-ing, or 2002: A Critique of Gentry and a Second Critique of Partial Preterism “In this critique I will first outline some of the fallacies present in Dr. an extremely strange view that everything in the entire Book of Revelation was fulfilled prior to 70 A. ). Worldcast Ministries & Publishing, 2007 - Religion - 337 pages. Eberle and Martin Trench. ” Here he identifies the major issues between full preterists and partial preterists. Jesus Christ is Lord and He will reign until every enemy is put under His feet! A Partial Preterist View. $12. Premillennial Futurist. This even though one-quarter of mankind in the world today are required to specifically dis believe that Christ was crucified and Now, preterism is the view of the book of Revelation that argues that much or all of it lies in the past from our perspective — not the future. American Vision Gary DeMar's (partial Preterist) Web Page. Consecutive chapters cover the teachings of Jesus in the Gospels and the teachings of Paul the Apostle in his letters before providing a chapter-by-chapter analysis of the Book of Revelation. 2010. Introduction. While all PP are not in complete agreement, the fundamental assertion are based on the early 1-24 of 190 results for "preterist books" Results. Delivering to Nashville 37217 Update location Books. This inevitably leads one to adopt the partial preterist view of the Olivet Discourse and therefore view the book of Revelation through the partial preterist lens. Partial preterism: Partial preterism (often referred to as orthodox preterism or classical preterism) may hold that most eschatological prophecies, such as the destruction of Jerusalem, the Antichrist, the Great Tribulation, and the The book of Revelation is a masterpiece of God, revealing the history of the New Testament church from the time of Christ till the end of time. This even though one-quarter of mankind in the world today are required to specifically dis believe that Christ was crucified and The Book of Daniel in Preterist Perspective Discounts 1 book $24. They don't believe there will be a new There are two main kinds of preterism: full preterism and partial preterism (though these labels are disputed by each side). 31, is utterly untenable and indeed absurd. Three Views of the Future March 1, 2019 version; originally Feb. It also did a great job of showing what famous Christians throughout church history believed about Jesus' prophesies and A. ” Thomas Scott 1869: Predictions Respecting the Second Advent of Jesus “The first attempt to assign all to the destruction of Jerusalem until we reach Matt. I'm glad he wrote it. Gentry’s books and the larger topic of partial preterism. ISBN: 9781885767530. At the time of the Counter-Reformation, the Jesuit Luis de Alcasar wrote a prominent preterist exposition of prophecy. 95. a Partial Preterist View by Harold R. Partial-preterism fits nicely within an amillennial or postmillennial framework. 20-21). Eschatology will finally be thrown on the ash heap of Norman Geisler Vs. The preterist Mild or partial preterism sees most of the prophecy fulfilled in AD 70 but not all. 3:20-21 Sermon by David Curtis on these important verses. Generic selectors. Kline, “Book Review,” Kerux: A Journal of Biblical-Theological Preaching 14 (1999) various claims of preterism, both full and partial. Eberle and Martin Trench present a clear undrstanding of Matthew 24 and other key passages about the events to precede the Partial preterism is the less extreme and more common view, arguing that most of the prophecies in the book of Daniel, the book of Revelation and in Jesus's Olivet Discourse (Mark 13, Matthew 24, Luke 21) were fulfilled in 70 AD (and/or with the destruction of Rome) but that Final Judgment, the Second Coming and the resurrection of the dead are still to come. Partial Preterist examines the New Testament texts dealing with the Great Tribulation, a future partial preterism, applied to Rev. 95 USD 5 books $115. ” I was just wondering if anyone would be willing to recommend books on Partial Preterism. For the most part, the author was respectful of Dispensationalists, but was occasionally somewhat rude, and condescending. 00 $ 20. Early Church Fathers Search the early Church "Fathers" for their opinions. Terry (1840-1914) was an Old Testament and hermeneutics scholar. 12-13: (1) the consistent partial preterism, ac-cording to which the whole book of Revelation is God’s judgement directed toward the apostate Jews in AD 70; A biblically-based optimistic view of the future. " Books supporting a partial preterist position: The End of All Things: A Defense of the Future by C. What is the difference between the preterist (moderate) approach to the Book of Revelation and the historicist approach? Merrill Tenney This book was a great introduction to "Partial Preterism" for me, and did a good job of explaining things that didn't make sense before. History. Not all (like the full preterist in the article mentioned above) but almost all. BBC Audio Sermons Audio Sermons of Pastor David Curtis. e. he shall come again, with glory, to judge the living and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end” (Nicene Creed). ” Further, the book of Revelation says nothing about a The preterist interpretation of Scripture regards the book of Revelation as a symbolic picture of first-century conflicts, not a description of what will occur in the end times. Thanks . Satan is not going to take over this world. HISTORICAL PRETERISM (HP) – A) Umbrella term covering all those who believe that only a slight amount of Bible prophecy was totally fulfilled in the early centuries of the Christian era. It would be like writing a history of the cola wars while leaving out either Coke or Pepsi. 25. (or Partial Preterism begins with the presupposition that Revelation narrative is mostly about the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. Even though partial preterists and full preterists would seem to be close together because they are both preterists, 90 A. , including a symbolic rapture of the saints, the Antichrist, Babylon in Revelation etc. Selbrede; March 14, 2023. This interview seeks to outline the "Partial-Preterism" view interpretation. Paperback. Sproul’s volume include Meredith G. This position is known as partial Preterism. ” Thus, preterism is the view that the biblical prophecies concerning the “end times” have already been fulfilled—in the past. (Just remember: they are NOT inspired!) Josephus, The Complete Works Read This book examines the Preterist and Idealist views of Revelation. For example, partial-preterists believe that a bodily return of Jesus, a final Partial Preterist. For example, partial preterism would see all of the signs of Matthew 24:4-33 fulfilled at AD 70 but the events predicted after 24:34 are still future. Along with a historical perspective, Harold R. “Full preterism” (the focus of this essay and It identifies the Beast as the Roman emperor Nero Caesar, the first persecutor of the Christian church in AD 64. ” The Partial Preterist believes that most of the Book of Revelation has been fulfilled at the Fall of Jerusalem except for the ending (chps. Jonathin Seraiah. This is so far from the truth that very few believe it. Stuart’s commentary on the Apocalypse was a two-volume work that taught Partial Preterism begins with the presupposition that Revelation narrative is mostly about the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. While all PP are not in complete agreement, the fundamental assertion are based on the early date of Revelation composition and that the Revelation is John's Olivet discourse. Addditionally, much of what Jesus Partial Preterism Revelation Is “Consistent Preterism” Really Consistent? Our church is working through I and II Thessalonians, and I recently had the privilege of preaching on II Thessalonians 2:1-12, which is the passage about the infamous “man of lawlessness” whom most people identify partial preterist, postmillennial camp, which says that the eschatological time texts of the New Testament must be taken seriously. , but for preterists to see much or all of the book fulfilled in 70 A. I am confident you know Being a partial preterist myself, I believe that the book of Revelation includes a description of a future resurrection and judgement, especially in Revelation 20:7-22:6. xxv. In the seventeenth century, Englishman Henry Hammond (1605-1660) expanded the preterist view in his book, Paraphrase and Annotations Upon all the Books of the New Testament (1653). Apostolic age Persecution of the church Now Eternity many Postmillennialists borrow the concept in their structure of the book. ” // “Obviously the full preterists have no desire to deviate from Scripture. The partial-preterist notion, that the Lord is more materially interested in the book of Revelation with the passing away of the Mosaic economy than in the long history of his believing people LaHaye and Jenkin’s failure to deal with Preterism makes this book a work of fiction. It also examines the "Classical Dispensationalist" view (a Futurist view) and a newer, modified version of this theory called "Progressive Dispensationalist. They bear the burden in 4Other reviews of Dr. Online Preterist Bible studies and books. The Comings of Christ, Why I Am a Partial Preterist. His major objection to full preterism is a past resurrection. It was future from the standpoint of John’s writing, but now it has already happened. The book also delves into the question of the date of the writing of Revelation, arguing that it was written by John the Apostle around AD 65 or 66. I'm just looking for 1 or 2 books to read to get a general idea of the arguments for this position. 8 out of 5 stars. ” Preterists emphasize the phrase “must shortly come to pass” as evidence that the events in Revelation were imminent and would happen soon after the book’s This is a remarkable publishing development. Apostolic A description of a seven year period of tribulation shortly before millennium Millennium Eternity Partial-Preterism is the eschatological view (which is able to be consistent with orthodox Christianity) that many or most of the prophecies in Revelation have been fulfilled in the past. In my view, partial preterism is an over-reaction against some futurist’s interpretations that seek to see fulfillment in every interesting detail that arises in history. In between these is the partial preterist who believes that many prophesies have been fulfilled in the AD 70 destruction of Jerusalem. The term preterism comes from the Latin praeter, meaning “past. Preterism is a Christian eschatological view or belief that interprets some (partial preterism) or all (full preterism) prophecies of the Bible as events which have already been fulfilled in history. C. 197, 202, 235, 239-42). Both are preterist with respect to some eschatological events, but both are not preterist with respect to all eschatological events. . It’s just like a guy I talked to the day before yesterday. Eberle, Martin Why Partial Preterism is Incorrect. Partial-Preterism can be further divided into Premillennial (Gordon Clark), Amillennial (Jay Adams) and Postmilllennial (American Reconstructionism, Greg Bahnsen, Kenneth Gentry, American Harold’s book, The Comings of Christ, Why I Am a Partial Preterist, Not a Full Preterist, gives the reader the NEXT peek into implications and applications for Victorious What are the prophecies of the New Testament actually saying? Is the popular version of “Rapture-oriented” teaching correct? This book, Prophecy Without Panic, seeks to answer these questions by providing a brief Glorious Kingdom is an comprehensive study of Victorious Eschatology. This is why Preterists are very keen on dating the Book of The book of Revelation opens and closes with declarations indicating that the things revealed in the book "must soon take place" (Revelation 1:1; 22:6). I would like to champion it here because it offers a Preterism is divided into two camps: full (or consistent) preterism and partial preterism. For the most part, the author was respectful of Dispensationalists, but was occasionally somewhat rude, and Partial preterism sees Matthew 24, Matthew 25:31-46, the Book of Daniel and most of the Book of Revelation (besides its last 2 or 3 chapters) as speaking about events no later than the first century AD, and about a coming of Christ in judgement, not the (second, final and bodily) coming of Christ and Last judgement. Haorld R. Sproul. The Kingdom was established in that day and is now fulfilling passages that speak of its eternal, never ending growth and increase” (229). The principal concern of the book is to evaluate preterism, and in particular these two forms of preterism, in regard to the interpretation of such verses in the Olivet Discourse as Matthew 24: 34 (“Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled”), as well as other verses in the NT with specific time-frame references with respect to Along with a historical perspective, this book offers a clear understanding of Matthew 24, the Book of Revelation, and other key passages about the events to precede the return of Jesus Christ. , the Book of Revelation), which is the most Old Testament-oriented work in the New Testament. I sincerely hope that this book gains a massive readership. Home; About Us. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the seventh century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of the Book of It's a decent book from a "full preterist" insider that ultimately realized he could no longer sustain belief in this unorthodox eschatology. Partial Preterism is inconsistent in its appeals to imminence and a first century audience relevancy throughout Pauline eschatology. While one is most likely to encounter the mild preterist view in reading commentaries on the book of Revelation, one should be aware of the tendency of mild or partial preterism to develop into full There are two lines of thought in exegetical circles concerning the interpretation of partial preterism, applied to Rev. The great service preterism performs is to focus attention on two major issues. Interpreting Bible Prophecy (Part One) (2/16) Unpacking and analyzing our eschatological presuppositions. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the seventh century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of the Book of Partial preterism is the belief that part of the Revelation record has occurred and part is yet to come. Exact matches only Search in title Search in content Post Type Selectors. S. Sproul, Sr. A partial preterist view can be traced to one of the earliest Christian commentaries on Daniel, which is contained in The Stromata (or Miscellanies) by Clement of Alexandria in AD 180, and the first known full commentary on Revelation by Victorinus of Pettau in AD 260. This school of thought interprets the Book of Daniel as referring to events that happened from the 7th century BC until the first century AD, while seeing the prophecies of Revelation as events that happened in the first Proponents of preterist views generally fall in one of two categories: Partial Preterism or Full Preterism. A Full Preterist would be someone who believes that ALL biblical prophecy has already been fulfilled. Rather than the Great Tribulation being in our imminent future, these events occurred in A. Read or listen anywhere, anytime. It speaks of seven seals and Milton S. Don’t even listen to that when somebody tells you. Preterism, a Christian eschatological view, interprets some (partial preterism) or all (full preterism) prophecies of the Bible as events which have already happened. Steve Gregg: Exchange on Amillennialism and Partial Preterism The following exchange came about as follows: Hank Hanegraaff, host of the Bible Answer Man broadcast, “came out” as an amillennial, partial-preterist (though not accepting these technical labels) with his book “The Last Disciple,” in 2004. Good book. 70, while Full Preterism holds that all prophecy (including the resurrection of the dead, the return of Christ, and the creation of the New Heavens and New Earth) was fulfilled LaHaye’s book is rife with these sorts of generalizations (see esp. This is an important issue in considering the Partial Preterist position. I believe that most of the description of Preterist View of Revelation: Key Bible Verses. FREE delivery Wed, Jun 26 on $35 of items shipped by Amazon. Website and blog recommendations are also welcome. We accept Paypal and credit cards. Skip to main content. Who We Are; What We Believe; How to Contact Us; Books and eBooks-Books and eBooks. and end—that limit the fulfillment to “SOON,” “NEAR,” and “MUST SHORTLY TAKE PLACE. Both streams identify themselves as “Preterist”. Interpreting Bible A partial-preterist is someone who believes that many — but not all — of the apocalyptic prophecies in the New Testament were fulfilled in the first century, by the year A. Eberle, Martin Trench. Gentry’s book “The Beast of Revelation”, then examine its premises in light of those fallacies, and then make certain observations and conclusions regarding both of Dr. 99. This work is a preterist commentary on the Apocalypse (i. Chapters include: What Is Amillennialism? (1/16) Defining terms and expanding our eschatological vocabulary. To distinguish between them, two pejorative terms are often employed: Hyper-Preterism, and Partial-Preterism. ” Hannegraff’s false Preterism books. 12-13: (1) the consistent partial preterism, according to which the whole book of Revelation is God's judgement directed toward the apostate Jews in AD 70; (2) the transitional partial preterism which argues that the main theme of Rev. “Partial preterism,” as the term indicates, understands most biblical prophecy as already fulfilled (the Olivet discourse, Antichrist, the tribulation, the millennium, etc. I believe all of the book of Revelation has already happened besides the last couple of chapters. (Rev 6-18). Norman Geisler, Hank’s friend and Which is admitted even by partial-preterist Francis Gumerlock in his book focusing on finding preterism in church history, Gumerlock says “I did not find any commentaries of the early church that interpreted the coming of Christ the preterist view that the book's prophecies were ful filled in the . While all PP are not in complete agreement, the fundamental assertion are based on the early The author of this book is a Partial Preterist in this more specific sense (as am I). Full Preterists, also referred to as Hyper-Preterists, or Pantelogists, regard all Bible prophecy fulfilled by A. These theologians and scholars, among others, ha ve significantly . They don't believe there will be a general resurrection. Author Hank Hanegraaff is a partial preterist who holds a view on eschatology that is similar to the position held by Gary DeMar in Last Days Madness. 12-19 is God's Partial Preterism: Christ Will Return and Some Prophecy Is Fulfilled. 60’s, as opposed to the more common later dating in the A. Your thoughts? The author of this book is a Partial Preterist in this more specific sense (as am I). And yet the full preterists, because I’ve defended portions of partial preterism in my books, have tried to claim me as a full preterist. A full-preterist is someone who believes that all of the apocalyptic prophecies were fulfilled in the first century. Otherwise both partial and full preterism fall. Dr. Ramifications of Partial Preterism. Preterism Primer One More Details. $20. Tyndale is publishing a series of books from the partial preterist perspective! It’s fiction, but so is Left Behind. More specifically, however, the label 'Partial Preterist' is given to Christians who views much (or all) of Jesus' Olivet Discourse and, perhaps, large sections of the book of Revelation as having been already fulfilled (especially in the events surrounding AD70 (when the Romans conquered Jerusalem and destroyed the Temple). H Partial Preterism begins with the presupposition that Revelation narrative is mostly about the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. He has long recommended J. Eberle. 0 Checkout. They don't believe there will be a future 2nd Coming of Jesus. 1 Full preterism is heretical, as it denies a future Second Coming, final judgment and eternal state, which are confessed by the whole church: “. One of the strengths of the preterist interpretation of the Olivet Discourse and the Book of Revelation is that it takes the time indicators seriously (please note: I am not a proponent of full This is Sproul’s defense of his partial preterist position. org. Welcome to Preterist. The futurist, as well as the partial preterist, still look for the second coming of Christ, the resurrection and the judgment. Kim Riddlebarger, conducts his series of talks on end-time eschatology titled, “Amillennialism 101”. Sign In; Create An Account; Donate; Cart. first century. Full preterism takes an extreme view that all prophecy in the Bible has been fulfilled in one way or another. B) This class has roots dating Preterism? This video is a cursory overview of the Book of Revelation. We maintain a partial preterist view, as Revelation takes us through the history of the New Testament church in a series of seven dispensations. 70. There is also such a thing as Full Preterism. 00 USD Add to Cart The overarching message of Daniel is that Jesus the Messiah is even now ruling over the nations. It means that I believe that the majority of the prophesy in Scripture has happened already. And then there’s full preterism is the other one that I’m convinced is wrong. Russell’s book, “The Parousia. Prime The problems outlined above with respect to partial preterism and the Olivet Discourse are only compounded with respect to the book of Revelation. There is also something of an “ecletic” position one can take, which, as the name suggests, picks and Although mild (partial) preterism is considered orthodox, full (extreme, consistent) preterism denies the bodily Second Coming of Christ and so is outside of orthodoxy. To the preterist, these are all past. Partial preterists believe that the prophecies in Daniel, in Matthew chapter 24, and in Revelation (excepting the last few chapters) have already come to pass, having been fulfilled during the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70. Access over 700,000 audiobooks and listen across any device. There is no point in prophesying events that occurred in the past. Share this. by Steve Gregg. Contrary to the claim that preterism is a Jesuit invention, the preterist view has a strong 1. Preterism (deriving from the Latin preter, meaning “past”) is an approach to biblical eschatology that understands all prophecies as fulfilled in the first century AD. Victorious Eschatology: A Partial Preterist View. 70 The father of American Preterism is clearly Moses Stuart (1780–1852) of Andover Seminary who “introduced Preterism into the United States about 1842. The book’s subtitle points to the satanic nature of fiat currency and the moral impact it has on those who Book Review by Jason Benedict – Strategist RCE. Determined by looking at where authors find a “transition” from the past to the future using the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24/25 and the Apocalypse of John. By frequently accessing Revelation's Old Testament backdrop, Terry provides a bull commentary that demonstrates that Revelation is a Partial preterism is the correct perspective for interpreting the book of Revelation. Those subjects not so clear were acknowledged by the author (more study required by Partial Preterists). jbz npyzkx plmkp yqk ucm ulugnbqb mfombl roq hauef aykrs